So how did I go? I can't say this inquiry was a success in the way I wanted it to be. I started with one goal and ended up achieving something I didn't realise I needed to do. At University, I learned the previous curriculum, but it wasn't until I started teaching it in my first year (2018) that I realised that until you do it, you have no real idea! This year has been like being a BT again with maths, reading, writing and oral language being new curriculums. Why didn't I treat it as if I was teaching as a newbie again? If I had have, my inquiry question would have been different.
The tamariki are writing a bit better, was it because I changed things? I'd like to think so, but mostly it is from filling the holes left by the new curriculum coming in. What I learned most, and what I had already learned but forgotten about, was that teaching a new curriculum requires more than just reading it, it needs to be actioned in order to get it embedded and right. Apparently I'm a slow learner.
I have changed my writing programme and introduced the following:
- fast feedback
- new activities to do independently
- "Think, Write, Check, Every Sentence". Does it make sense?
- Daily sentence combining
- Nothing is considered a draft, always must use good handwriting (is this my best?)
- Sentence structure explicit teaching
- Parts of speech explicit teaching (previously done but not to a huge degree)
I have continued and enhanced:
- daily morpheme work
- daily spelling rule work
- daily handwriting work (working towards automaticity)
No comments:
Post a Comment